Alzheimer's patient was forced to drain the savings of life after an assessment error of "cutting and gluing" NHS

An elderly woman with Alzheimer’s after her family claimed that NHS officials were “cutting off and pasteing” other patients’ reports to use her life to show her to show that she Is not eligible for financial support.

Hilda Buller died at the age of 92 at the age of 92, after not deprived tens of thousands of pounds to take care of him after the NHS Lincolklemire (ICB) Care Board was deprived of him.

However, Lincolnshire ICB has now been forced to repay the deprived family of Ms. Buller because of the severe assessments her family says.

Steve Panton, the son -in -law of Ms. Bulller, said she was unable to communicate with the family because of her severity of her condition.

Mr Panton said, “And also raised his two children, Hilda did all the time of a transport cafe. He paid all his taxes and never paid for its benefits. It is a shame that is a shame that When he was exposed to the most vulnerable and terrible disease, the NHS tried to deny the financial support we have now proved to be right. “

When Bowler was evaluated for NHS care for self -care, the task concluded with private evaluators said the initial report said he was “fully attended”

Mr Panton said there are several issues about that report.

“He was not at this meeting and could not satisfy the meeting, he could not form a sentence, he couldn’t want a cup of tea, he could not comb his hair – unfortunately he was completely unable to The devastation of these diseases, “Mr Panton told the Independent.

“A complete sentence is written about a male patient [in her assessment]”

That sentence in the report, seen by Independent“Employees to anticipate all of his needs and to evaluate the risk from him and his favor,” he said.

Steve Panton with paper hills that the family used to fight for justice (Prepared)

Initial assessment in 2018 and follow -up in 2019 showed that Ms. Bulller did not support key indicators to qualify for full care.

“This means that Hilda’s life decline is driven by hundreds of pounds a week,” Mr Panton said.

The family spent six years in the war for ICB to confirm his mistakes and return his money, after an independent review in 2023, he found that Ms. Bull was met with multiple key indicators and should take care of her completely under The cover was placed.

“Simply put, for a complete budget agreement, we needed two ticks in areas used to judge patient’s needs, such as skin problems and cognition. . ”

“Panel gave us the eight -tiece care panel. The only explanation is that NHS -led evaluations are focused on money saving, which is another violation of the rules, while the independent arbitration assessment board is based solely on the basis The evidence was “.

“We have been in contact with the Boller family since the concerns were first shared six years ago. In order to handle these, NHS British first reviewed and [Integrated Care Board] To ensure neutrality, an additional review was conducted by an independent entity.

“We have fully accepted that the family had to receive different services from us, and we’re sorry that this did not happen at first,” he said. The family involved, we have modified.

“While this case is closed now, we would like to express your apology to the family again.”

Mr Panton said he wants to know other families that happened if they are in the same situation.

“The laws governing these assessments are clearly stated by the NHS in a law book called” National Framework “,” he said.

“The contents of other reports are very low from this condition. Anyone who is exposed to this embarrassment of refusing the budget can now claim new evaluations because any report that this way is next to It must be invalid.