An electoral campaign group has claimed that assessing the impact of the government on the dying law helps, proved that there will be a financial incentive to end people’s lives.
The claim of the Care Group (CNK) came after the government identified at least £ 59.6 million pounds a year to help with death. CNK believes that the actual value is much larger because the savings are not measurable in the benefits.
However, Kim Leadbeater, a worker representative of the bill, warned: “The cost will be very human.”
“If it is not difficult to pay for injustice and to provide dignity to its compatriots in its final weeks and months, it is difficult, but it is true that we see what effect will have on changing the law,” he said.
With the bill, which is to be discussed in the public in just two weeks, his supporters argue that the evaluation of the government has confirmed that it could be delivered in England and Wales with the help of death safely, morally and compassionate.
But Dr. Gordon McDonald, CNK chief executive, warned that financial incentives could encourage the NHS to lead people to choose their lives or people with illnesses to feel that they are once.
He noted that the evaluation of the impact confirms that the change of law saves costs, both health care costs up to £ 59.6 million and a reduction in profits, which is unreliable.
He claimed: “In Oregon, the current bill pattern in parliament, the majority of those who end their lives, fear the upload of their families, supervisors or finances as a reason for their decision.
“In Canada, politicians have spoken about the regional health care budget since introducing Ethanasazi, with some estimates indicating $ 500 million, unfortunately, it involves the elimination of funds from a sanatorium that refuses to kill their patients,” he said.
“In the Netherlands, not only the Dutch has saved, but amazingly, they talk about how this policy increases the availability of organs for transplantation, what Dr. David Shaw and Professor Alex Morton have argued in 2020.”
Dr. McDonald emphasized how the sanatorium has a £ 150m hole in its budget, with one in all four Britons who do not receive relief care currently.
“Introducing the so -called dying will be an extremely dangerous policy that will put vulnerable, elderly and disabled people to put pressure on their lives early,” he said.
However, British humanists and my death, my decision to support the bill, argue that the evaluation of the impact has helped with fear of death.
They pointed out that if the law is changed, it is generally expected to save the government – although the maximum “tens of millions on the cost of NHS will be £ 180 billion a year.”
“Due to this, the decision to change the law should not be about the economy, but about the death of assistance in essence the right approach,” they added.
“Death is not assisted,” said Andrew Capson, the executive director of the UK, “Legislative is working in more than 31 jurisdictions around the world, where performances in Australia, New Zealand, the United States and Europe have shown that it is safe, compassionate and practical. It is time for parliament to give people and people.
Claire McDonald, my manager, my decision, added: “These reports confirm what we have long known – that our current laws are dying and the current status is unacceptable. Every day it is delayed, another day that one is chosen with dignity, long pain and suffering.”
