JFive days ago, Sir Kier Storm sat a travel package from British journalists in G7 in Canada, assuring them and their readers that Donald Trump would not attack Iran.
“Nothing said the president said he intends to participate in the clash, on the contrary, the G7 statement is about destruction,” he said.
“I think what he said was that he wanted to go beyond the ceasefire effectively and end the conflict. And I think he’s right about it. I mean the ceasefire is always a means of achieving the goal.
“This is consistent with what we agreed yesterday around the table. And I was sitting next to President Trump during my dinner yesterday, so in my mind, the level of agreement was in relation to the words that were immediately issued shortly after dinner.”
He brought together that he was sitting next to Trump to insist that his reading of what the US president would do was correct.
At that time, Trump had left the Resort in Alberta earlier and was in the White House again. A few hours later, he was sending a threat to Iran on social truth.
Last night, five days after telling Starr to journalists, he was allowed to bomb Iran on Friday two weeks to return to the negotiating table.
The question is: Why does the Prime Minister just confuse what the US president says and will do?
This is not the first time that Sir Kir has suggested that Trump has done a job and then the US president has acted the opposite.
When the two held their first official meeting as Prime Minister and President in March, we can return to the cozy Starner conversation at the Oval Office.
At that time, just before Trump’s delivery, the king’s invitation to visit the state, Sir Kier said he wanted to “thank you for changing the talk in the war in Ukraine.”
It seemed to be a strange phrase even after that, given that Trump appeared to be dead, forcing Ukraine to accept peace based on Russia.
But 24 hours later it seemed much worse after Vice President JD Venus and President Trump humiliated Voldimir Zelnsky in the same elliptical office and forced him to leave his meeting.
Then, in May, President Trump and President Trump were in opposition to a public magnification call to congratulate each other on the trade deals that had just entered the White House Tariff regime.
“Donald, thank you for your leadership,” the prime minister emphasized the terms of the first name.
Everyone seemed to be all until the end of the month when Trump announced that steel tariffs were 50 %, not 25 %, and it turned out that the British/ US trade deal had not actually been implemented.
Last week, it took mostly to derive most of the steel transactions, which are still subject to British tariff debate, with a 25 % hope of zero percent still on the table.
At any time, it seems that the Prime Minister wants us to think the best Trump only for the US president, which seems to be determined to make him wrong.
This may think about the head. After all, he is constantly hoping to do the right thing.
There is one to point out that what he can say in this other situation, especially as his main diplomatic policy seems to be as much as possible, the weakening of Trump’s and Korean President Korea as much as possible.
To be fair, Striver has been more successful in internationally than he is in the international stage, and he correctly speaks of his “warm relationships” with the US President, which in turn has gone out of his way to praise the prime minister’s leadership.
There is a popular American phrase of “talking about things”, which means that if you want something to happen, it is better to say that this will happen and hope it will be enough to make sure.
But this may be due to the vague nature of the US president. He thinks one thing in a moment and changes his opinion when he gets out of the room.
This can be all the above. But even those who wanted to believe Starr last week thought that he was very simple in the suggestion that the president was pursuing.
All this reflects a complex international situation for the Prime Minister in his first year and one case that is only heated.
The problem is that our prime minister seems to be incapable of guessing what the greatest international player and the most important ally in England will do in the future.
