Sir Kier has canceled the British NHS to bring health care in an effort to reduce bureaucracy and save money.
In a surprise move, the party leader, who founded the NHS, announced that he cancels independent Quango, which has implemented more than a decade of health care and reduces 10,000 jobs.
The ministers said the programs help save hundreds of millions of pounds each year, which are used to reduce waiting time by reducing red tape to help speed up health care.
The Tory Kemi Badenoch leader cautiously welcomed the move because his party warned that it should deliver, while health institutions and unions said that another NHS re -organizing would lead to “time and energy” away from improving patient care.
However, former Health Minister James Bethel tweeted: “I wish we could do it.”
This dramatic move only comes at the top of the NHS, including the resignation of the Executive Director and its medical director, just a few days after the departure.
With the announcement of reforms during a speech at Kingston on Hall, East Yorkshire, Kiere pledged to go further and cut off the bureaucracy throughout the state, focusing the government on the priorities of working people. [and] Change the money to the front line “.
He said scratching NHS British puts “NHS in the heart of the government and releases it to focus on patients, less bureaucracy, with more money for nurses. NHS was reused in your hospital.”
And he added that this only promises to make the only “hard choice” he will make: “In this period, they will continue.”
Based on programs that are due to begin now but can take two years, the British NHS, which the government describes as “the world’s largest Quango”, is returned under the Ministry of Health and Social Care.
Sir Kier said the body, created a decade ago by Tories, when waiting lists mean that NHS could at least not tolerate it, had a large number of “reproduction”.
“We are copying things that can be done once,” he told his audience.
The reforms of the “final nail in the coffin” were the “catastrophic re -organization of the previous government”, which led to the longest waiting time, the least patient satisfaction and the most expensive NHS in history. “
The move is expected to save at least £ 500m a year and can see half of the 15300 people working for the UK NHS and half of the 3,300 working at the Ministry of Health.
NHS CEO Sir James Mackie supported the change, though he admitted that the announcement was “worrying” for the staff.
But health thoughts warned that the re -organization of other NHS has led employees to divert and divert employees from working health care for patients.
“History tells us that the repayment of NHS organizations is very distracted and rarely offers the benefits that politicians expect,” the NHS scratching British will completely disrupt the time and energy of senior leaders at a time. ”
Sarah Wolleno, executive director of the King Fund, said the potential savings are part of the massive NHS budget, adding: “Structural change is at a significant opportunity cost, with employees who otherwise spend their time trying to improve productivity, ensure security and get the best results for patients.”
Professor Nicolas Ranger, secretary -general and chief executive of the Nursing College, warned: “The re -organizing the chaos that created the NHS British spent billions of dollars and paid attention to clinical care. Now no one can repeat that the NHS performance is currently in the least historical and money.”
The view was repeated by Professor Phil Bangfield, the head of the British Medical Association, who said, “The experiences of doctors have not been positive from the re -organized NHS. This should not be a distraction from the basic work that is ahead.”
Union employers said in a way that the prime minister reported on job damage to British NHS sources Independent They have not paid attention to them, and there is in the office when the news is published.
“How to deal with the basic news is nothing short of shame. Certainly it could be managed in a more sympathetic way,” said Cristina McNa Anna.
Despite the creation of the British NHS, Tories appear to be cautiously welcoming it.
“I think any government that has been selected will have to do whatever it thinks he or she will do to provide services to the public,” said Kemi Badenoch.
“So if that’s what they think is needed, I don’t have any competence with it. I don’t think everything should go to a quantum.”
“We support measures to simplify NHS management and the principle of direct control,” said Alex Borgart, Chancellor Duchy of Lancaster.
But he added, “The ministers of the work now have no place to hide or someone else who blames NHS performance.”
Liberal Democrats said these reforms are a welcome, but it is not important unless Mr. Streaming “ignoring the elephant in the room” to reform social care to reduce the number of people stuck in the hospital and do not need to be there.
Last week, Professor Sir Stephen Pavis, British Medical Director, said he was standing this summer, just a week after the surprise resignation of Amanda Pricard, who is closely followed by three other senior executives.
