Europe was divided of Striver's commitment to send soldiers to Ukraine

There has been a gap among European countries whether it is in line with Kier Storm’s commitment to send British troops to Ukraine, as the allies respond to US President Donald Trump’s pressure to agree with Vladimir Putin.

While leaders attended an emergency summit in Paris, the sections were revealed in the midst of fear that Washington would reduce defense commitments beyond the Atlantic Ocean.

The Emergency Summit announced its plan to abandon Europe after Mr Trump’s announcement of Ukrainian peace talks with Mr Putin.

Sir Kier said he would be willing to participate in security guarantees by putting our soldiers on the ground, and repeating similar statements by Emmanuel Macron.

He later urged the United States to provide “behind the scenes” to prevent Russia from invading Ukraine again if Britain puts the soldiers on the ground.

“Europe must play its role, and I am ready to commit British forces along with others if there is a lasting peace agreement,” he said.

“But there must be behind the scenes of the United States, because the US security guarantee is the only way to effectively prevent Russia from attacking Ukraine again,” he told reporters in Paris.

But several other EU countries refused to follow the British leadership, and Poland rejected such a move.

Prime Minister Donald Tusk told Paris before boarding the plane: “Poland will support Ukraine as he has done so far: from an organizational point of view, in accordance with our financial capabilities, in terms of humanitarian and military assistance.”

We do not intend to send Polish soldiers to the Ukrainian territory. We … provide such physical guarantees to countries that may want to provide such guarantees in the future. “

Keir Starmer to negotiate with Ukraine with European partners (Carl/PA) in Paris (Wire)

Meanwhile, Sweden, Germany, the Netherlands and Spain stated that they had not been decided on the matter and needed more confidence before the soldiers committed.

“Future questions about security architecture are being reviewed at the due time, and emphasizes that if a clear framework is put on the ground, Germany” will not be embarrassed, “said Germany.

The section is ahead of a critical meeting in Riyadh between Russia and the United States on Tuesday when Marco Rubio’s foreign minister leads the leadership of an American delegation who will seek to end the war.

Voldimir Zelksky said Ukraine has not been invited to negotiations and will not accept the result if the bag is not involved. He will travel to Saudi Arabia this week, but his visit is not related to the talks.

While the White House has not revealed who will meet exactly US officials, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov flew on behalf of Putin on Monday.

Sir Kier, due to travel to the United States later this month, said that any settlement must be “a sustainable peace agreement, not just a pause for Putin again.” He also said that the “generational challenge” facing the West requires Britain and Europe to “increase the ability” and use Mr Trump’s demands for European allies for more costs for defense.

Donald Trump has pushed to European allies to spend more for defense (AP)

But the deprivation of Ukraine from the negotiations has put Britain in a period of dealing with the Republican government, though Kier has repeatedly warned that there is no “talk about Ukraine without Ukraine”.

“If there is a peace agreement and everyone wants to have a peace agreement, then there must be a lasting peace treaty, not just a pause for Putin again Come

“So there should be discussed. There is also a broader peace here, which is collective security and defense of Europe. And here I think we have a generational challenge. We all have to be in terms of the abilities and tasks that as We do Europeans, and this is certainly the message I make. “

Former Army Chief Lord Richard Denat said: “Sir Kier was” doing the right thing “with support for a peaceful force in Ukraine, but warned that it would come with a” considerable cost “.

He told the BBC that Britain does not have forces or equipment “to put a great force for a long time”.

Among the US warnings that Europe should spend more on defense, US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegest said costs should reach 5 % of GDP.

Britain is currently spending 2.3 percent, and the labor force has pledged to increase it to 2.5 %, but it has not specified how to achieve this goal. The last time the British defense costs topped 5 percent in the 1980s was during the Cold War.

Earlier on Monday, Downing Street did not reject the vote on the issue of a peaceful role for British soldiers in Ukraine.

Responding to a question about the outlook for the voting perspective, the prime minister’s official spokesman said: “Since the beginning of the conflict, there has been extensive support for supporting Britain in Ukraine. We have been going to play our role in future security guarantees.

“But we do not want to go out of its decisions, and obviously parliament will continue to be updated and consult if necessary.”